The end of the Chomsky affair
You may remember last October The Guardian ran a "profile" of Noam Chomsky, apologised and then took the article off its site. We wrote about that here. An independent review of its decisions is now out supporting the decision to apologise but saying the Guardian did not have to remove the story.
Aaronovitch and his fellow complainants objected to the correction, arguing that Prof Chomsky "most certainly does seem to believe that ... Srebrenica was not a massacre". He had in the past put that case, they said, "directly and unambiguously".
In his adjudication Mr Willis disagreed, finding that Prof Chomsky had said nothing in the interview to justify the claim that he had put massacre in quotation marks. "Nor in the long complaint from David Aaronovitch and others is there a direct quote from Chomsky that supports an opposite view."





0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home