A couple of weeks ago I
wrote an article in the Sunday Star-Times about public intellectuals.
Who are they, and did we need them, the piece asked. It took a deliberately softly-softly approach, as I was keen to tease some debate from this rarely touched subject in the gossamer-thin brainscape of Kiwiland.
Was this a waste of time, on the part of the writer, the publisher, and me? Was this a waste of money, the marketing money, the money given to get this project into print?
I have respect for the editor - he was a tutor. I have respect for a contributor, Roger Horrocks - he supervised my thesis.
But surely the role of public intellectuals is to engage with the public, in a timely fashion, regardless of the forum, regardless of the publication. Public intellectuals in Europe - Umberto Eco, etc - write smartly, amusingly on everyday subjects in the public eye in the papers. That is the point.
If you have something to say, say it. And say it with wit and style and intelligence.
Public intellectuals, if they do exist in NZ, need to say and do more.